Broker Review

Unauthorised Firm Details

Name: Sentinel-fe.com
Website: sentinel-fe.com

Overview

Sentinel-fe.com presents itself under the banner “Sentinel – Guardian of Financial Integrity” (as per its domain metadata) and appears to promote services relating to payments, finance, crypto. According to a domain-analysis report, the domain was first registered on 21 February 2025.

Key Findings & Red Flags

1. Very Young Domain & Limited Reputation

   • The domain was registered recently (February 2025).

   • It has low visitor traffic / low web ranking, per scam-checkers.

   • A new domain isn’t automatically fraudulent, but it means less track record to verify.

2. Hidden Ownership / Privacy Registration

   • WHOIS data shows the owner is hidden via a privacy service (“Whois Privacy Corp”).

   • The registration address is in the Bahamas/Bahamas-registered domain.

   • This kind of anonymity can be legitimate in some cases, but in combination with other items it raises caution.

3. Service Type: High-Risk Area (Crypto / Recovery / Financial Services)

   • The site is flagged as offering services such as “fund recovery” or “cryptocurrency services” which are known to have many scams.

   • One evaluation (by Gridinsoft) gave the site a trust score of only 23/100, calling it “Suspicious Website” and warning that it may pose security risks.

4. Minimal (or Insufficient) Independent Reviews

   • Only one review on Trustpilot, negative in tone.

   • No substantial track record of verified customers or feedback from independent sources.

5. Possible Marketing / Messaging Inconsistencies

   • In the Trustpilot review, a reviewer alleges the representative claimed the company “was started a year ago” while the website domain was only ~12 days old at that time.

   • There may be mismatches between claims and verifiable facts.

 Assessment

• The site displays multiple red flags: very recent domain, hidden ownership details, operating in a high-risk service area (recovery/crypto), very limited track-record, and negative feedback in user review. It should be avoided.