
Unauthorised Platform Details
Name: Cryptohjltd.xyz
Website: cryptohjltd.xyz
Cryptohjltd.xyz presents itself as a cryptocurrency investment platform. Their website claims to offer digital-asset trading services and high returns, using typical crypto-marketing language. However, this entity is not what it appears. According to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, cryptohjltd.xyz is unauthorised — operating or promoting financial services without permission.
Specifically:
-
The FCA issued a warning on 25 April 2025 stating that the firm “may be providing or promoting financial services or products without our permission.”
-
Review sites flag cryptohjltd.xyz as unregulated, with no verifiable licence or registration.
The address listed by the FCA is “60a Station Road, North Harrow, HA2 7SL” in the UK for the website’s contact.
High risk
-
Lack of regulatory authorisation
-
According to their own review, the firm is not regulated by any of the major regulatory levels (Level 1, 2, or 3).
-
Because it is unlicensed, if you deal with them you do not benefit from protections such as those offered by UK’s Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
-
-
Promises of high returns / guaranteed profits
-
Reviewers accuse the site of offering unrealistic returns, which is a common tactic in investment-scams.
-
-
Anonymous or opaque management
-
No credible leadership information, no verifiable track record, no third-party audit.
-
-
Withdrawal risk
-
The site may allow deposits, show “profit dashboards”, but then either refuse withdrawal, ask for extra fees, or vanish.
-
-
A warning from a major regulator
-
The FCA’s listing of the domain signals a strong caution. Regulators do not normally issue warnings unless there is meaningful evidence of unlicensed operations.
-
Final verdict
Based on all available evidence, cryptohjltd.xyz appears to be an unregulated entity offering dubious crypto investment services. The combination of regulatory warnings, lack of transparency, high-risk promises, and common scam tactics points strongly toward it being unsafe.
Submit your review | |



